On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Thibaut VARENE <vare...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> 
> wrote:
>> Dear Debian maintainer,
>>
>> On Monday, May 28, 2012, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
>> concerning debconf templates for uptimed.
>>
>> The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
>> and the final proposed changes are attached to this update to the
>> original bug report.
>>
>> Please review the suggested changes, and if you have any
>> objections, let me know in the next 3 days.
>
> Only one:
>
>  Template: uptimed/interval
>  Type: string
>  Default: 600
> -_Description: Seconds that should pass between database updates:
> - Uptimed will update its database every n seconds so that the uptime
> +_Description: Delay between database updates (seconds):
> + Uptimed will update its database regularly so that the uptime
>  doesn't get lost in case of a system crash. You can set how frequently
>  this will happen (use higher values if you want to avoid disk activity,
> - for example on a laptop). 60 seconds should be a reasonable default.
> + for instance on a laptop).
>
> In the Description, the suggested value should match the default value of 600.

And I misread the patch. Scratch that. Sorry ;P

-- 
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to