Hi there! On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:55:14 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:57:42 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: >> > The attached patch allows bacula to be built with binutils-gold. I >> > tried to follow your patching approach, rather than add the change >> > directly to the diff.gz. >> >> Stephen, thank you for the patch. However, as explained at [1], >> Alexander's patch is simpler, applied to the Git master branch: > > No problem, in the two-and-a-half years since I sent the patch a lot > has changed!
Actually, upstream provided a different patch, which I tested on the current package adding a (forced) Build-Depends: on binutils-gold: <http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b82cc6db4bf9323593c156eea0163c718ff6096> Testing packages are available at: <http://pkg-bacula.alioth.debian.org/tmp/merging-development2-branch/dev2.0109.2/> Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpPcLx5dmT9A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
