On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:15 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 17:13 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:07:20 +0200 > > Svante Signell <svante.sign...@telia.com> wrote: > > > > > FYI: Porting of 0.7~rc3 to GNU/Hurd is almost complete. The patches > > > will be submitted to this bug number, #672212, when they have been > > > reviewed a second time. Is that OK, or should a separate bug report > > > be created? > > > > Yes, that's fine. > > Attached are the patches of ifupdown-0.7~rc3 for supporting GNU/Hurd: > > patch0: Fix some spelling errors in ifupdown.nw > patch1: Add a dependency on inetutils-tools to dh_gencontrol > patch2: Add a new file: testbuild-hurd for the tests > patch3: Changes to ifupdown.nw for the port.
I see that this bug is not marked as having a patch, or pending upload, while bug #296115 does. Should I merge these two bugs, and fix the patch/pending status of #672212? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
