Hi Simon, On Sun, 27 May 2012 01:44:21 +0200 Simon Ruderich <si...@ruderich.org> wrote: > The attached patch "fixes" the issue, but it's only a dirty > workaround. The upstream build system should be fixed to not > overwrite CPPFLAGS at all (CPPFLAGS are only for preprocessor > flags anyway), autoconf/automake provide ways to handle that.
Thanks for your patch, but how about attached one? (almost same) > Even though the "Fortify Source functions" are now correctly > passed, they are not used at the moment. But that's fine. I'm not familiar with hardening, so could you explain why this is fine? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
CPPFLAGS
Description: Binary data
