On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:57:53PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > > please don't clutter the output on a file basis. > > git-annex's display format is carefully designed for its use case, which > is large files. I'm probably not going to throw all that away on the > basis of one apparently off-topic throwaway line in a bug reportg am I?
The output may already be quite overly verbose with 1k of big files. With 200k the "carefully designed" rsync output isn't good. I'm pretty sure the default git tranfer protocol output is "carefully designed". music or image collections easily surpass 1k of files and should be considered as annex use case. concerning the original point consecutive rsync calls might very well introduce overheads compared to sigle calls, unless proven wrong on that point this critique stays. > > On larger repos this is really endless and thus gives a "slowness" feeling > > to the git annex transfer. > > git-annex has a -q option if you want to use it. quiet would be no output in my eyes, ah git annex help tells me it is the misnomer for progress bar. best -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
