Hello, some new infos for this bug:
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Von: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho ifi.uio.no> > An: Sam Watkins <sam nipl.net> > Kopie: kjetilho+listadmin ifi.uio.no, noel debian.org > Betreff: Re: listadmin for mailman 2.1 > Datum: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:28:40 +0200 > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:29 +0000, Sam Watkins wrote: > > I am using mailman 2.1 (for the site http://nipl.net/) > > and I found that listadmin 2.27 does not work with this version of mailman. > > So I mangled it to make it work, attached. > > > > it is also at http://sam.nipl.net/all/listadmin/listadmin-mm2.1 > > > > I found it difficult to keep compatibility with older versions of > > mailman, so this version only works with mailman 2.1 > > > > It's a bit of a mess, but seems to work okay and maybe it would be > > useful to you or someone else. thanks for writing and packaging > > listadmin! I am willing to do some work to get it to work with older > > versions again, God willing, but I don't have any old mailman installs > > to test it on. > > excellent work! one hard problem is to recognise the Mailman version > automatically, but now I think I should punt and require users to > specify the version explicitly in the .ini-file. the default should be > "2.1" I guess (although not at our local site, since we're still running > a quite heavily modified 1.2! :-) I guess I'll see better what's > possible after reintegrating your patch. > > thanks! -- Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
