Package: archivemount Version: 0.6.1-2+b1 Severity: wishlist Hi,
just tried using archivemount with a .7z archive, but it unfortunately didn't work, the mount point is empty. Before I tried archivemounting a .tar.xz which worked fine, but unfortunately also took a while on this 1GB+ archive. I'm not really into the details of compression algorithms and their container formats. But I'd guess that theoretically mounting a .7z archive should be much faster as the directory and file information are somehow more easily accesable, therefore not requiring to uncompress the whole archive before getting that information compared to .tar.xz, right? At least with 'ark' displaying the archive contents is instant with a .7z, while with the .tar.xz it again takes a while. As both .7z and .tar.xz use LZMA, the size of those two is pretty much the same. Therefore .7z could be a supperior solution to .tar.xz or .tar.lzma for archivemounting? Looks like .7z is supported by libarchive, too. Cheers, Linus -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages archivemount depends on: ii fuse 2.9.0-1 ii libarchive12 3.0.4-1 ii libc6 2.13-32 ii libfuse2 2.9.0-1 archivemount recommends no packages. archivemount suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
