On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:02:15PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net): > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:47:26AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Package: sysvinit > > > Version: 2.88dsf-24 > > > > > > If you do: > > > > > > debootstrap sid sid > > > chroot sid dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/acrchives/initscripts*.deb > > > > > > you will be left with a mount on sid/run/shm > > > > > > The related Ubuntu bug is > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/974584 . > > > > > > A debdiff proposed (but not yet pushed) to fix this in Ubuntu follows. > > > > Could you possibly try with -25 (in experimental). I fixed a bug with > > I'm only seeing -24 right now, will re-check in a bit. > > (http://packages.debian.org/experimental/sysvinit)
Hmm, looks like the upload went wrong last night; it was not accepted for some reason. I've reuploaded--it's definitely passed through the upload queue. In the meantime, you can also get the packages here: http://people.debian.org/~rleigh (It's now also in incoming, http://incoming.debian.org/sysvinit_2.88dsf-25.dsc) > > /run/shm handling last night, though it was related to size > > determination rather than chroot handling it's not impossible that it's > > related. > > > > WRT the patch, if ischroot is behaving incorrectly, then the ischroot > > utility needs updating. > > Ok - as I said in the Ubuntu bug I do suspect we don't want that part > in there. I'm not sure whether 'chroot dpkg -i *.deb' without > mounting /proc is meant to be supported. In practice, /proc is required. There's too much that needs it; just look at the usage in maintainer scripts--they rely in it without checking for its presence. The mounting and unmounting of /proc is a good workaround, and it's something that the ischroot tool /might/ be best doing, especially since it's relying on it being present. However, whether this should be done basically depends on whether using a chroot without /proc being mounted is supported. I would think "no" is the answer, to be honest. IIRC debootstrap mounts /proc automatically, and all the chroot usage on Debian e.g. build and user chroots either have /proc mounted in fstab, or use schroot to set up the chroot automatically. > > Given that /run/shm should be handled identically to /run, and > > /run/lock, I think it's more important to work out why it's > > behaving differently than the other two. I assume that the other > > two are not being mounted? > > Correct. Only /run/shm. > > I'll try -25 when I see it, thanks. Thanks. Given your more detailed explanation, I'm not sure that -25 will address your immediate problem, though it's certainly possible there is something odd happening with /run/shm we need to correct. Thanks, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
