On 2005-10-04 at 13:24, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> elucidated: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Michael Schiansky <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe its a valuable feature request, i think it might > > be usefull. > > Quite possibly, thanks for forwarding such requests :) > > > >It'd be nice to have an option to store buffers to the PRIMARY buffer, > > >an opposite of the -S switch. > > I don't quite understand what that means, could you elaborate in more > detail what the effect should be? "The opposite of -S" and "take stdin" > seem to be contradicting each other.
Just meant to say you had the -S switch which would take from PRIMARY and put it a storage buffer. But you didn't have a switch to take a storage buffer and put it into PRIMARY, AFAICT. > > > >What I'd really like to do is to take stdin and store it in the > > >PRIMARY > > >buffer, copy from the command line. > > "xclip -i" seems to do exactly that, no? > Oh, I was unaware of xclip. I guess I better check that out. -- Dale Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] /.-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
