Sorry, but could you please clarify these two statements? On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:24:56PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Yes the usb table hogging the cpu is a known issue: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-04/msg00149.html > > however the cpu load should drop to zero even when you have the usb > tablet enabled.
> > I'll leave it to you to decide what to do with this information. Can > > anyone reproduce this? > > Yes. Saving cpu cycles without the tables is reproducable here. Does usb-tablet cause extra cpu load or not? According to powertop, with usb-tablet, I didn't see wakeups/second go under 800. Without, the system easily reached 150. > Did you create the vm using virt-manager? It's adding the tablet by > default since we can't easily distinguish between systems that need it > and those that don't. With virt-install. Is this a good default? I'd expect tablets to be quite rare. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
