On Tuesday 04 October 2005 06:30, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason for this is apparently the difference in the > directory layout: the subdir "strict" is missing. I really think we > should put the sources for the policy in /etc/selinux/; using the > same dir structure as upstream. We can keep pristine copies in > /usr/share/selinux as well; but having the current policy, which is > meant to be admin editable in /usr/share (which may be shared, or > readonly, and outside the /eyv hierarchy is also, strictly speaking, > debian policy violation. > > Also, I would much prefer to use debconf, and md5sums for > policy files, and something like a combination of ucf-like > functionality and apache modules like single, multiple choice > checkbox questions to revert changes to local policy files -- one > single question, not makny, asked through debconf, not otherwise, and > also only asked once, and then again only if the maintainer version > has changed.
This will all change when we move to the "reference policy". Until that time I don't want to make any significant changes as it would be a waste of effort. The current policy is in maintenance mode. Once I get the current significant bugs solved I will cease working on it and start working on the reference policy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
