tags 671551 + pending - moreinfo
kthxbye
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:02:41AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Alessandro Ghedini <al3x...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying. Could you please point
> > me to
> > a package that uses debian-pkg-add-load-path-item?
>
> debian-el in /etc/emacs/site-start.d/51debian-el.el for example
>
> (debian-pkg-add-load-path-item
> (concat "/usr/share/"
> (symbol-name debian-emacs-flavor)
> "/site-lisp/debian-el"))
>
> or you can let-bind the flavour directory expression, eg. haml-elisp
>
> (let ((package-dir (concat "/usr/share/"
> (symbol-name flavor)
> "/site-lisp/haml-elisp")))
> ;; If package-dir does not exist, the haml-mode package must have
> ;; removed but not purged, and we should skip the setup.
> (when (file-directory-p package-dir)
> ;; Use debian-pkg-add-load-path-item per s9 of debian emacs subpolicy
> (debian-pkg-add-load-path-item package-dir )
> (autoload 'haml-mode "haml-mode"
> "Major mode for editing haml-mode files." t)
> (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.haml\\'" . haml-mode))
> ))
>
>
> > I've looked into a few but
> > all of them use load-path in their startup scripts.
>
> Many don't obey the policy yet, and cut and paste seems to propagate
> setups from one package to another :). But the intention described in
> the debian-emacs-policy.gz is sound.
Ok, I think I've fixed this now (commit 34ec7b7). Now the startup script looks
like this:
> (debian-pkg-add-load-path-item
> (concat "/usr/share/"
> (symbol-name debian-emacs-flavor)
> "/site-lisp/ecasound-el"))
>
> (autoload 'ecasound "ecasound" "Run an inferior ecasound, with I/O through
> BUFFER." t)
> (autoload 'ecasound-ewf-mode "ecasound" "A major mode for editing ecasound
> .ewf files." t)
>
> (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.ewf\\'" . ecasound-ewf-mode))
Is this correct?
Cheers
--
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
