Package: lists.debian.org Dear listmasters,
it has been a couple of days that the digests I receive are broken: the subject is not displayed anymore, and the mail headers are moved after the main text. Here is an example of what happens with mutt, but if bounce the message to a mailbox opened by Iceweasel, the symptoms stay the same. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan. ----- Forwarded message from debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org ----- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) From: debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org To: debian-devel-dig...@lists.debian.org Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V2012 #357 Reply-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <20120507170915.d3bc1...@bendel.debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2012 : Issue 357 Today's Topics: Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Unidentified subject! [ ] Subject: Unidentified subject! Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: melodie <melo...@riseup.net> * Package name : openbox-menu Version : 0.3.6.7 Upstream Author : mimas <mimas...@free.fr> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/mimarchlinux/wiki/OpenBoxMenu * License : (GPLv3) Programming Lang: (C) Description : Openbox pipe-menu to display entries in *.desktop files. (openbox-menu uses *.desktop files and libmenu-cache to generate, display, and keep Openbox menu entries up to date.) SWL_LOW, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626CD1A for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 15:52:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id NLlMWfON_2qO for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559994A for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75765373E; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: melo...@fulvetta.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id 8470616D Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:51:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TcOpbG9kaWU=?= <melo...@riseup.net> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Cc: x-debbugs...@bendel.debian.org: <debian-de...@lists.debian.org> Subject: ITP: openbox-menu -- Openbox pipe-menu to display entries in *.desktop files. Message-Id: <20120507175148.72050c1d.melo...@riseup.net> Organization: mine X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i586-mandriva-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <mLxQ3NDZQEK.A.H7H.rO_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:09:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Would it be unreasonable if someone were to start an > "uncommon-licenses" package? =C2=A0Then any package depending on that cou= ld > use a reference to the license instead of including the full text in > debian/copyright. I realize that this misses a certain aspect of interpreting the legalize of licenses, which is that many believe the full text of a license needs to accompany all source and binary files. So then an additional aspect of this solution could be a helper that takes a copyright.in containing license file references and replaces that with the appropriate full text. Best wishes, Mike inal-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBCBD27 for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:11:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.689 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id 1-YVXiX5HYxH for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.9 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com (mail-yx0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC19CC4 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3so4357231yen.6 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 07 May 2012 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/CX+Gbiw+efzek/eUKGwRLDiYERTuMrdX+1qHZTajfc=; b=CiZzXvuDFr4scl0na3i0hxIgIbSp7AgGYdiOBEvmiOkeaevF7sQDBVX7AxWsq2DrVU aNtJaFC0juILXkw0MEuCt2Pph8og77WuhSa0kotDXvOyBpsn4tHWw1DhyO5awDQB0pM3 HBZA5/IMUSFTQhbG2//YwfDYQAd6Jcpsp6ZuscDxJSEkKAkOnHwn1n1hdhU6PmDae4gV On2UaubBBoUBInGUrGkMhCyGBD4hPCLFJMIxG6Dr9e8Nz/TndHffyE9/iHXg6F0b9kzL FRMPKEPj8fsAMbpx3tbzrWj3D9WAsggNLhen0Hfy7PgygIYREvCMCCq/PVstaIVW8FUD uxyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.201.134 with SMTP id b6mr19808041yho.55.1336407087978; Mon, 07 May 2012 09:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.176.99 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:11:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CANTw=moj44ovpw4xhjmrcnl+pkyek30-ckfepuonu+k0z4t...@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120507103358.ga30...@debian.org> <CANTw=moj44ovpw4xhjmrcnl+pkyek30-ckfepuonu+k0z4t...@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:11:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5OGxa0jZnLMgjZ2bLoXujLipwvU Message-ID: <CANTw=MN-xwqpVCOW0r_XUptzc=aea7nkySKxysSdaKqAAag=u...@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses From: Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <sSXAJTSv5x.A.Ka.GR_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:11:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com> writes: > Would it be unreasonable if someone were to start an "uncommon-licenses" > package? Then any package depending on that could use a reference to > the license instead of including the full text in debian/copyright. Does that satisfy our legal requirements? common-licenses is more than just a dependency; it's essential, and it's extremely difficult to create a Debian system that doesn't have it. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE00504 for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:24:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id feT6sjo7Aae3 for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0730E505 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 46A3E450DE5 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9DF450D65 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A144025726; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses In-Reply-To: <CANTw=moj44ovpw4xhjmrcnl+pkyek30-ckfepuonu+k0z4t...@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Gilbert's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 11:55:34 -0400") Organization: The Eyrie References: <20120507103358.ga30...@debian.org> <CANTw=moj44ovpw4xhjmrcnl+pkyek30-ckfepuonu+k0z4t...@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:24:18 -0700 Message-ID: <87ehqwez7x....@windlord.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <8oVRK1-yXx.A.oFC.Jd_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:24:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! On 05/08/12 00:04, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > >> Means that services can be started (and stopped?) in response to events >> such as hardware discovery, incoming network connections, the status of >> other services, and so on. (With dependencies still taken into >> account.) > I want to add another major event: the service exiting. > Being able to reliably monitor and automatically restart a failed > service is critical. well, that's another 10 lines of shell worst case. We haven't agreed on how exactly to handle it and make it configurable and stuff (especially as tools like monit cover that niche better) but - here's the magic: $ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/openrc/release_agent /lib64/rc/sh/cgroup-release-agent.sh So, whenever a CGroup becomes empty we trigger a script. That script now can do ... well ... everything. Including restarting ${SVCNAME}. Where we disagree is mostly the policy - is that enabled by default? (potentially bad) What if a service gets restarted multiple times? (infinite loop) Do we want to add a general notifier? (send an email, "foo crashed, I restarted it) Apart from that it's trivial to add restarting functionality. > >> No, enough politeness. We get that you like the way Gentoo does things >> (lots of options, you get to keep the pieces when they break), but some >> of us are trying to make Debian better than that. We don't need more >> half-assed options, we need a solution. > AOL. > Y'all really want to play that game? Ok, let me play too. I like games. Bash - debian had netdevices disabled for the longest time, which made it impossible to just use a normal script that leveraged that awesome feature. So, uhm, not cool. Some packages broken on purpose. See nginx (old stupid version not supported by upstream) that has some random broken thirdparty modules compiled in so that the upstream documentation doesn't apply for loadbalancing. Extra bonus: that breakage got imported into other distros like ubuntu. "But a single package is not representative of the distro" yeah right, now suddenly that's not fair game? OpenSSL. Now, we can just continue mudslinging, and in the end it's great fun but nothing productive, or you guys could just stop looking down on everything else and accept that sometimes other people do produce decent things. If you want to make Debian better you could start by looking at where others have eclipsed you already and figure out how to catch up. Unless you are willing to accept that possibility and learn you'll be stuck in NIH hell and rediscover every little corner case and trivial bug that others already fixed years ago. But, hey, that's not my fight. I won't stop you from being silly, I just reserve the right to point and laugh at appropriate times. Have a nice day, Patrick ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <3Xnumc3T86.A._WC.ie_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:26:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> writes: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> Would it be unreasonable if someone were to start an >> "uncommon-licenses" package? =C2=A0Then any package depending on that co= uld >> use a reference to the license instead of including the full text in >> debian/copyright. > > I realize that this misses a certain aspect of interpreting the > legalize of licenses, which is that many believe the full text of a > license needs to accompany all source and binary files. > > So then an additional aspect of this solution could be a helper that > takes a copyright.in containing license file references and replaces > that with the appropriate full text. I can add support for something like this to dh-exec, but the usage will be slightly awkward, since executable debian/copyright is not supported, but an executable debian/$package.docs is. So I can write a dh-exec tool that pulls in the right license for you, and all you need to do to use it, is to not have a debian/copyright in the source, but (for example) a debian/copyright.in, and this in your debian/$package.docs: ,---- | #! /usr/bin/dh-exec --with=3Dcopyright-magic | debian/copyright.in | copyright-magic | README.md | whatever-else-you want `---- Of course the syntax would have to change a bit to make more sense, but I have a bus to catch. It might even be possible to have a debian/copyright and overwrite it via debian/$package.docs, but I haven't verified if that would work. --=20 |8D censes Organization: BalaBit IT Security Ltd References: <20120507103358.ga30...@debian.org> <CANTw=moj44ovpw4xhjmrcnl+pkyek30-ckfepuonu+k0z4t...@mail.gmail.com> <CANTw=MN-xwqpVCOW0r_XUptzc=aea7nkySKxysSdaKqAAag=u...@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:32:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CANTw=MN-xwqpVCOW0r_XUptzc=aea7nkySKxysSdaKqAAag=u...@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Gilbert's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 12:11:27 -0400") Message-ID: <87havs3qa5.fsf@algernon.balabit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <q6cEZh2uQ4P.A.vLG.91_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:30:11PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >(lots of options, you get to keep the pieces when they break), but some >of us are trying to make Debian better than that. We don't need more >half-assed options, we need a solution. Well, it seems we have a problem to define what is =E2=80=9Ebetter=E2=80=9D= =2E Without this=20 definition we won=E2=80=99t get the right solution. I prefer several half-a= ssed=20 options I can choose from instead of having one solution I don=E2=80=99t li= ke and=20 I can=E2=80=99t change. Then I can use Windows again. Shade and sweet water! Stephan --=20 | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: s...@fsing.rootsland.net | | Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html | --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+n/W8ACgkQXse+NwPOAZ4OFACfZ/tF1Nsl16HmFym0veYjjzLd 7foAoLkAEdET40WtQhfla0BZiGZuyQGE =Rrr0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- ndel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id CAOQGMULSTpF for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:51:38 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 Received: from fsing.rootsland.net (fsing.rootsland.net [IPv6:2001:4ba0:cafe:17a::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562106C for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from osgiliath.gondor (mue-88-130-29-193.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.29.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Stephan Seitz", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by fsing.rootsland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354B3C950027 for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:50:56 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.1.3 fsing.rootsland.net 354B3C950027 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fsing.rootsland.net; s=mail20100714; t=1336409456; bh=HVicKZS7KG4OIunCuhfwR28OYk/VfBpIee750FVkwn0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=J0A8ApBU8yrmExVDATVWMB//f7BMz9I1FPr6ZBMfRcKoYNsYHtszE/jJQPGnvR8Fu 3gjwvmvFaasqyBzn5HJFeXgAM2QVcKi0VSlhdVGo3UWl1PnvyR9Z2QcgRRAtAzTLQZ QOdDWiaIAsjALeYMWsGebmhgITmZfpZfDXmxWmfU= Received: by osgiliath.gondor (Postfix, from userid 10009) id 9A3BD60087; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:50:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:50:55 +0200 From: Stephan Seitz <stse+deb...@fsing.rootsland.net> To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFC: OpenRC as Init System for Debian Message-ID: <20120507t184242.ga.0c28d.s...@fsing.rootsland.net> References: <20120426062737.GA5875@zptr-nb18> <87aa1zc737....@kirika.int.wmdata.fi> <4f98fd7c.4020...@bzed.de> <1335427073.3615.502.camel@pi0307572> <1335459955.3707.138.ca...@hp.my.own.domain> <1335461275.3615.664.camel@pi0307572> <1335472164.3707.144.ca...@hp.my.own.domain> <1335513264.3615.667.camel@pi0307572> <4fa7d6ce.7030...@gentoo.org> <1336401011.8274.316.camel@deadeye> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1336401011.8274.316.camel@deadeye> Organization: Minas Tirith, Gondor User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <K7oggMq_Qj.A.cVG.n2_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:51:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Unidentified subject! On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > So you don't support for instance 1.0~git20120503, then? (the git > snapshot from today of what will become 1.0) They would probably call it 1.0_git20120503 since apparently they don't believe in the _ field seperator. -- Len Sorensen UTC) Old-Return-Path: <lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on bendel.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1621D6C for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:54:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.31 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id TPhqi8Pm6j68 for <lists-debian-de...@bendel.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:54:41 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -7 X-Greylist: delayed 542 seconds by postgrey-1.33 at bendel; Mon, 07 May 2012 16:54:35 UTC Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.134.17]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B2ED5C for <debian-de...@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix, from userid 20367) id 01A1B87972; Mon, 7 May 2012 12:45:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:45:29 -0400 To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: smaller than 0 but not negative (Re: question about "Conflicts:" Message-ID: <20120507164529.gy10...@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <4f950206.8080...@aixigo.de> <201205021928.39275.hol...@layer-acht.org> <20120503102540.ga17...@gaara.hadrons.org> <201205030916.28502.hol...@layer-acht.org> <4fa2a61c.4000...@gentoo.org> <87lil92qdt....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lil92qdt....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) From: lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 Resent-Message-ID: <Q-Ex14tAnDL.A.ywG.o5_pPB@bendel> Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org X-Loop: debian-de...@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-de...@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:55:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Debian-Message: from debian-devel Mail-Followup-To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
