On Sunday 06 May 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:44:39PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > yes, I think most of apreq is in httpd trunk. But it is not in > > the 2.4.x branch. It will take some time until the remaining > > open questions about apreq's integration are sorted out. Maybe > > it will be added to a 2.4 release, afterwards. But I am pretty > > sure that this won't happen in the next few months. > > In other words, we pretty much can't expect much help from upstream > here? If I want apreq2 (and in particular, libapreq2-perl) to be > in wheezy, I'll need to do a significant porting effort myself?
The C-part should not be much effort (it compiles). But mod_perl is a rather big problem that may still prevent the 2.4 transition for wheezy. There is a start of a thread about apreq at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd- dev/201204.mbox/%3C1335492759.77968.YahooMailNeo%40web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E But it has not come to a conclusion. The interest from httpd devs who are not mod_perl devs is not that big. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
