[ Adding Samuel to CC. ]
On 2012-05-03 12:27 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 05:13:07PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Package: ncurses-term
>> Version: 5.9-7
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> On 2012-05-01 12:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>
>> > There is however apparently a discrepancy between the
>> > bogl-provided bterm and the ncurses-provided bterm (I assumed that they
>> > were the same, but they are not), resulting in quite a few glitches e.g.
>> > in mutt. The ncurses one is probably outdated, we will have to fix that.
>
> It would be nice to have details (or a screenshot).
Indeed. Since I don't actually use bterm or mutt myself, this has to be
provided by Samuel, though.
>> Running infocmp shows the following differences (bterm-bogl being the
>> file from bogl 0.1.18-6, bterm-ncurses the file from ncurses-term
>> 5.9-7):
>>
>> ,----
>> | comparing bterm-bogl to bterm-ncurses.
>> | comparing booleans.
>> | comparing numbers.
>> | comparing strings.
>> | acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
>> 'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
>> | op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
>> | sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
>> `----
>>
>> There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
>> differences in acsc and sgr:
>>
>> ,----
>> | # Notes:
>> | # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
>> qjxamlkut
>> | # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
>> `----
>
> right (I read the source-code using the Debian package as a reference,
> and that's accurate enough barring updates past my review at the end of 2009).
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
