On Wed, 02 May 2012 10:08:19 -0400
David Prévot <taf...@debian.org> wrote:

> Package: emdebian-grip
> Version: 3.0.7
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n

This is another area where workflow could be improved. Translating
manpages is a very significant amount of work and I wouldn't like to
see the efforts being wasted but I did not know you were working on
this translation.

There are changes going on in this package which could result in large
portions of the package being dropped. (The emdebian-grip-server
package is being overhauled as the debian-grip sub-project to integrate
emdebian-grip into Debian. The new scripts are closely tied into dak
and DSA procedures, making them less likely to provided as a package,
let alone translated. If this binary is dropped from the source, the
size of the man page translation could drop by half.)

The new scripts are sufficiently different that development is
happening in parallel, without showing any changes in the
emdebian-grip
VCS.

Discussion of the processes involved has been happening on the
debian-embedded mailing list and this has been ongoing now for months
(it started when I got back from DebConf11).

http://wiki.debian.org/EmdebianIntegration

Whatever happens, please don't think of emdebian-grip as an NMU
candidate to fix this bug. There is likely to be an upload but it is
uncertain whether the bulk of the translated strings will make it into
that upload.

> Please find attached the updated French manpages translation, proofread
> by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
> 
> This file should be put as doc/po/fr.po in your updated Subversion tree.

A way of checking if it is worth starting a significant translation &
proof-reading would be worthwhile. Normally, I seek translations when
the package(s) are in suitable state. I wasn't expecting anyone to be
doing translations on this package and I wouldn't have asked for
translations until the future of the emdebian-grip-server binary was
resolved.

It would be useful if there was some simple way of marking a package as
"stable" and suitable for translations outside a string freeze and
"development" where things could change dramatically, whether or not
that change is visible in the VCS.

I appreciate that you took the trouble to go to the VCS but it's not a
guarantee that other changes are being discussed elsewhere.

The strings in the PO are up to date, it's just that I am worried that
I may have to drop so many of the translatable strings before the next
upload (which will be followed by a squeeze-backport).

(The current scripts are quite buggy and difficult to use which is part
of the reason for considering dropping the alternative - I simply won't
have time to maintain the old server scripts and the new dak-specific
server scripts.)

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpDBOisdnxCD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to