On Fri 27 Apr 2012 at 10:09:14 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Ad 1) I didn't realize that I still had another font installed, the > Opentype Cantarell font. I was so focussed on Truetype fonts and > gsfonts-x11 that I simply overlooked it. When I removed this one, I've > got the exact same symptoms that you described. Since this sounded a bit > too random, I suspected the culprit to lie in our fontconfig query.
I put fonts-cantarell on the system but it did nothing for me. Maybe it isn't important because it only replicates a part of what you have. > Please comment out the line and rebuild the package following the > procedure I described in one of my previous mails. If you feel > unconfortable editing the file manually (you should), you might as well > apply the patch I attached to this email (again with "quilt import > /path/to/patch" and then "quilt push -a"). Please rebuild the package and > try again. This is important, though. After rebuilding and printing there is now a /tmp/printout file which pdffonts identifies as having the Liberation fonts embedded. If it is of interest, here is part of the error_log: D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] Page = 612x792; 18,36 to 594,756 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022003l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Regular.ttf:TrueType:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Chosen: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Regular.ttf/0 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022004l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022003l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Bold.ttf:TrueType:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Chosen: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Bold.ttf/0 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022023l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022003l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Italic.ttf:TrueType:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Chosen: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-Italic.ttf/0 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022024l.pfb:Type 1: D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022023l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022004l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/n022003l.pfb:Type 1:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Candidate: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf:TrueType:100 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] [Job 39] ### Chosen: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf/0 D [27/Apr/2012:10:58:13 +0100] PID 17922 (/usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopdf) exited with no errors. > If this really turns out to be the culprit, I have to check with the > fontconfig maintainers what's wrong about this command. In any case, it > did not achieve what it was supposed to do, because most of the fonts in > the list suggested by fontconfig and printed out by my fc-test program > were non-monospaced, anyway. Thank you for perservering with this and for the guidance. I'm available for any future testing you may need. Regards, Brian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
