On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 01:43:16PM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: > I've retested this problem with u-a version 0.76.3 and I see that the > problem is still not fixed but also that the logic is already > implemented in another block: saving a log file or not. > > See attached debug log. That message was printed only on console > (stdout), even though the last lines are telling: > DEBUG:root:Sending mail with > '/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2012-04-24_13:23:45.634738.log' > to 'root' > > But there is no such file. So, could this logic be used in the > "Sending mail" block too? [..]
Thanks for your mail! This bugreport is interessting and I'm happy to implement the required change to not send a mail if nothing changes. However I wonder if that is what should be default? I mean, it seems like its very interessting to know that a package did *not* get upgraded (in some sense more interessting than if the package got upgraded) because in the default configuration it means there is a open security issue on the system. Maybe we could use the idea from bug #652719 and add "U-A::Mail-If-Packages-on-Hold" (any unify the options too) and the option would default to "true" for the rational above (that it indicates a open security issue). What do you think? Thanks, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
