tags 666172 + patch
tags 666172 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for dvi2dvi (versioned as 2.0alpha-9.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.

--
Jakub Wilk
diffstat for dvi2dvi_2.0alpha-9.1 dvi2dvi_2.0alpha-9.2

 dvi2.c                            |    2 +-
 dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/debian/changelog |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -u dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/debian/changelog dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/debian/changelog
--- dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/debian/changelog
+++ dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dvi2dvi (2.0alpha-9.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Use kpse_set_progname instead of kpse_set_program_name (closes: #666172).
+    Thanks to Adam D. Barratt for the bug report.
+
+ -- Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org>  Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:23:34 +0200
+
 dvi2dvi (2.0alpha-9.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [Jari Aalto]
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dvi2dvi-2.0alpha.orig/dvi2.c
+++ dvi2dvi-2.0alpha/dvi2.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
 #endif
     G_progname = argv[0];
 #ifdef KPATHSEA
-    kpse_set_progname(G_progname);
+    kpse_set_program_name(G_progname, NULL);
 #endif
     if ((dvi2path = getenv(DVI2PATHENV)) == NULL)
 #ifdef KPATHSEA

Reply via email to