On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2012-04-14 13:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks for working on fixing this in stable. fwiw, "-6+squeeze1" is > > more conventional, although it's unlikely to make a difference in this > > case. Please feel free to go ahead with the upload. > > I'm not exactly sure whether the nvidia-graphics-modules packages in > squeeze would work with "-6+squeeze1", but it does work with "-6squeeze1".
I didn't immediately spot a reason why it shouldn't, but you know the package better, so okay. > I'm hesitating with an upload because Nvidia recommends not to use the > patch for a lot of older GPUs due to regressions: > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=178460 Yay. :-/ > PS: will I be able to do the upload myself or does it need to be > sponsored? I'm DM and have DMUA in the packages in sid, but there are a > few transitional packages in squeeze that are no longer built. I think it works, as long as the latest unstable/experimental upload has the flag set. There's one way to find out for sure... ;-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
