Le Sunday 15 April 2012 09:14:48, vous avez écrit : > On 14.04.2012 20:36, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Xine is now looking for plugins in multi-arch'ed directory: > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xine/plugins/2.1/ > > > > ii libxine2 1:1.2.1-0.4 > > You are using the xine packages from debian-multimedia.org, not the > official Debian packages.
Arg. This bug was so obvious that I've searched for mistakes in my setup, I've waited more than a week before reporting it. I did not realised that xine was also packaged by the mighty Marillat. :-p > The xine packages in Debian don't have MultiArch yet. > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libxine2-misc-plugins/filelist > > Any suggestion on how to resolve this? Maybe a conflict on epoch+1? Well, let's say I do not really fancy a package conflicting with a future version of itself. In this instance, multiarch'ed xine should look in both directories to ensure a smooth transition. Unfortunately, this would require Christian to patch his xine package. Ideally, all package from debian-multimedia should have a -dmo suffix (with proper conflict and replace statement). This would have several benefits: - avoid confusion between vanilla debian and dmo when logging bugs (like this one) - would enable users to cherry-pick between the 2 repos without using apt- pinning tricks - would avoid using epoch to distinguish between 2 repos Unless this happens to be a bad idea, I'll raise the point to the dmo mailing list. As for this bug, I think you can close it. It's not a pebkac issue but close ;-) All the best Dominique
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
