On 16.04.2012 10:25, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: >> And especially if first, simple, kvm1.0 variant >> _does_ show the bad speed already, there's no need >> to try others, since the prob might be somewhere >> else entirely: this binary is equivalent to what >> was in 1.0-8 but rebuilt using current toolchain >> from wheezy. > > Interesting. I tried your binaries now and the first "kvm1.0" binary > you provided me _does_ have the bad performance (~2.3 gbit/s). > Returning to the "old" -8 binary gives full performance again.
In that case it must be some toolchain issue, not something in qemu-kvm itsel... Sigh, I wish I was able to reproduce it locally... :( Now, the fun task for me is to figure out which versions of gcc/binutils/etc were used to build -8 version :) And this basically means that a backported version of -9 should work fine, since it will use older and proven toolchain. Lemme try... Thank you for the help and support so far! /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
