Quoting Jakub Wilk (jw...@debian.org): > (I'm not the maintainer.) > > Hi Christian. I saw your NMU in deferred. Unfortunately there are > some problems with it: > > - The NMU diff hasn't been sent to BTS. (Or maybe I can't find it. > You wrote you'll send it on April 10...)
Has been indeed sent in the bug report where I was originally working (an l10n update) > > - You changed source format from 1.0 to 3.0 (quilt). I don't believe > that such a change is suitable for an NMU. Well, that's debatable. As the package currently includes several upstream changes in the Debian diff, adding one more change to that pile just makes it bigger. So my view is that switching to source v3 makes at least the new patch easier to identify in the future. > > - As far as I can see, you fixed #650582, but didn't close the bug > in the changelog. > > - Apparently the package wasn't built in a clean environment: the > binary package depends on libpng15-15, which exists only in > experimental so far. Oh, that's correct. My sid chroot has a leftover from another build where I was needing experimental packages. Maybe, by the way, this is what caused the FTBFS. I rebuilt the NMU in a cleaner environment. And, indeed, the patch is no longer needed, so the FTBFS was itself caused by the build environment using packages from experimental. So, my new NMU is now again an l10n-only NMU.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
