Hi all,

>  /usr/local/share/texmf     not owned
>  /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R     not owned

didn't we have this before??? I faintly remember infinite discussions about 
that.

But I also remember that I didn't remove and code around that, ehich means that 
*sonewhere* in the packages there is an unprotected
   mktexlsr
run which does not specify trees, so the one in texmflocal is generated.

I'll check on that.

Norbert




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to