Hi Hilmar,
thanks for the example, yes, that is true.
On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Hilmar PreuÃe wrote:
> ifxetex.sty is in texlive-base. The problem goes away if
> \usepackage{xeCJK} or \usepackage[french]{babel} is commented. The
Well, honestly this is a common problem, you ar enot expected to
mix everything with everything. Especially, looking at xeCJK, I see
a lot of things that might create problems, like
\AtBeginDocument{%
\xeCJK@patch\textellipsis {\begingroup\makexeCJKinactive}{\endgroup}
\xeCJK@patch\textemdash {\begingroup\makexeCJKinactive}{\endgroup}
or
\xeCJK@postPunct{25}{00}
\xeCJK@prePunct{30}{08,0A,0C,0E,10,12,14,16,18,1A,1D,1F,36}
that smells like playing around with with these things. Babel also
is known for doing many tricks, so honestly, I am not convinced
that there is a good solution.
> - LaTeX from stable and unstable
> - XeLaTeX from stable
> *not* using XeLaTeX from unstable.
Yes, because in this case xeCJK is not loaded (in the latex case).
SO I assume the change comes from xeCJK.sty.
> I'd vote for contacting (d)ctt to ask for a comment.
I guess yes, that is the best solution, or ask the xeCJK maintainers.
In any case, this is not a packaging issue, so if it is solved, fine,
if not, I can live with it, the failing document has to be
adapted.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEVENSEY (n. archaic)
The right to collect shingle from the king's foreshore.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
