On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Olaf van der Spek <olafvds...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Arno Töll <deb...@toell.net> wrote: >> So, as a start, web applications should recommend a web server like >> this if they ship both, an Apache2 configuration file and a Lighttpd >> configuration file: >> >> Recommends: apache2 | lighttpd | httpd > > What's the advantage over apache2 | httpd or just httpd? > >> Of course, that's not enough to run for a PHP application. I was >> outlining lots of ways to execute PHP scripts on a web server. I do >> not see what's so bad to depend on libapache2-mod-php5 or whatever PHP >> maintainers provide these days. > > It's basically code duplication. What if php6 comes along? > What if another php provider is added? > > With Apache 2.4, isn't FastCGI the recommended way to run PHP?
Arno? -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
