On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:16:15PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: dsdo > Version: 1.6.25-1.1 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part: > > make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/myspell' > > sort -u ../ispell/words-da.complete \ > > | bash ../no-compound_marking ../words-da.no-compound \ > > | LC_ALL=POSIX sort -u \ > > > words-da.complete > > make[2]: *** Deleting file `words-da.complete' > > make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > Build killed with signal TERM after 15 minutes of inactivity > > ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ > > Build finished at 20120330-2016 > > The full build log is available from: > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/31/dsdo_1.6.25-1.1_unstable.log
Just to comment that it is known to take a long time, but finally build, see build times at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dsdo amd64: Build needed 00:12:51 armel: Build needed 00:49:24 armhf: Build needed 01:40:08 hurd-i386: Build needed 00:48:35 ia64: Build needed 00:16:07 kfreebsd-amd64: Build needed 00:20:27 kfreebsd-i386: Build needed 00:19:56 mips: Build needed 01:05:50 mipsel: Build needed 00:58:40 powerpc: Build needed 00:16:53 s390: Build needed 00:09:41 s390x: Build needed 00:10:37 sparc: Build needed 01:01:32 When I was playing with this package I also thought it was stalled, but giving enough time it built. I do not think this deserves serious priority, but would however leave an open bug report with lower priority asking for better efficiency if possible. I leave this to maintainer/submitter choice. Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
