On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > OCAML might be in a similar situation, but it seems that they donât use > libffi. Their packages do, however, all seem to have a dependency on > libc6 which corresponds to our situation. Only that a so-name bump of > libc is probably less frequent than one in libffi...
That's probably because they're shipping dynamic binaries instead of static ones? Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
