On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Package: shellinabox
> Version: 2.11-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Your package is not installable:
>
>
I thought that that might come back to haunt me. Part of the trouble is
that the shlib:depends automatic
dependency won't include libssl. Do you know how else to encode that
dependency?
The same command doesn't generate an error WRT libssl on my test host.
What does apt-cache policy say about libssl0.9.8?
> ,----
> | $ LANG=C apt-get -s install shellinabox
> | [ ... ]
> | The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> | shellinabox : Depends: lsb-bbase but it is not installable
> | Depends: libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8m-1) but it is not
> installable
> `----
>
> The first problem looks like a typo, the second one is because the
> dependency is hardcoded rather than expanded from ${shlibs:Depends}.
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: wheezy/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.3.1-nouveau (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
>
>
>
