On 04/04/12 23:00, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > While I have your attention: does the patch series in #631287 seem to > prevent the BUG as advertised without any noticeable unpleasant > side-effects? How long have you been testing it?
I've been running a 2.6.32-41 kernel with those patches for 8 days, but all I can say is that I haven't noticed any *new* issues. My USB-attached APC UPS is working exactly as before, although still affected by #409349 (control queue full). I have never experienced the #631287 BUG to date, so I can't say if the patches really made an improvement. I would plug/unplug the UPS a few times to check for this, except: > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > root 1068 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Mar28 0:00 [khubd] > root 8488 0.0 0.0 12704 220 ? Ds Mar29 0:00 /sbin/apcupsd I've not rebooted since the last time I last experienced #409349, and it seems the UPS was not even detected when I plugged it back in just now. Sometime, perhaps in a few weeks when this box is retired from production use, I should repeatedly plug/unplug the UPS: * on an unpatched kernel, to make sure my specific hardware was affected in the first place * on the patched kernel, to make sure the patches have really fixed it Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
