On 13/02/12 09:43, Teodor MICU wrote: > 2012/2/11 tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org>: >> Would there be a problem with simply addressing all of the rdepends >> prior to the release? I believe Andrew Ross has filed bugs on the >> affected packages. > > That's the think, I believe this won't be enough. I just noticed on my > workstation that libpg-java is one of the packages removed from Debian > archives (candidate for removal in synaptic and 'aptitude purge ~o'). > At this point I noticed that other packages depend on it and would > also be removed. I searched Debian PTS and found that it was renamed. > > I manually installed the new package and than I could simply remove > libpg-java *without* removing the r-deps. Thus no upgrade path from > Debian 6.0 to 7.0. > > Thanks >
Actually I think you're right for any dependency which declares a specific version of libpg-java that it requires. I'll look at adding a transitional package. Andy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
