block 666067 with 666293 thanks Hi,
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 07:50 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:09:22 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > > There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi > > (#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172), ptex-bin (#666170), texfam (#666171). Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before. > FYI. ptex-bin is replaced with new TeXLive packages > and should be removed, at least, in a near future. Okay. We'll remove it from testing once everything else is ready then; I guess an RM request will appear for unstable in due course. > texfam is (obsolete) japanese TeX system and it should > be removed if it failes to be compatible with libkpathse6. > I'm not sure if texfam could be compatible with libkpathsea6 > or not but I'll contact the maintainer about this issue > afterwards. > (BTW texfam might be programmed for libkpathsea3 or 4, IIRC) Thanks. Any news on that? > dvi2dvi is a program mainly to convert DVI generated by texfam > (well, JTeX precisely) to a format of pTeX's DVI so it is useless > if texfam is removed. Okay; let's see what happens with texfam. > I hope this helps you a bit. Yes; thanks. That just leaves us with catdvi and dvi2ps to sort out. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
