On 01-Apr-2012, Santiago Vila wrote: > In this particular case, there is a manpage which is generated via > texinfo2man, so the indent-doc package does not add any info which is not > already in the manpage.
I agree that a mere HTML rendering of what is already in the ‘info’ document and the man page is not useful enough to suggest to ‘indent’ users. I wonder why it is packaged, then? > Do you think this fact is interesting enough to create a README.Debian > just saying that? No, I don't think that's interesting enough to add to the README.Debian. > (I do not believe a "Suggests: indent-doc" would be really useful). I think that exactly one of these is true: * There is a useful purpose for an ‘indent-doc’ package, and ‘indent’ should Suggests that package. * There is no need for an ‘indent-doc’ package, and that package should not be generated. By your description, it seems the latter is true. -- \ “Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except | `\ for that rare story of which you happen to have first-hand | _o__) knowledge.” —Erwin Knoll | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
