Package: pango1.0 Severity: wishlist
Just another one :) Please rethink if the questions you ask via debconf are necessary. Each question takes the users time to read and also adds complexitivy and necessary translations. Let's look at the questions :-) "Do you want to entrust font management to defoma?" AFAICT all other font packages simply use defoma. What is so special about pango, that it cannot also simply use defoma. "Your old pangox.aliases file has been saved as /etc/pango/pangox.aliases-old." AFAICT all packages backup files with *.dpkg-old or something similar. Other packages don't tell users about this, as they know. "/etc/pango/pangox.aliases was not found. Now update-pangox-aliases will " "generate a default pangox.aliases. You may modify the generated file to be " "suitable for your needs." That's the same as with the first debconf Q. I think pango1.0 should simply use defoma. I am not a maintainer, but I translate quite a few debconf messages and yours seems pretty much unnessary to me. Keep up the good work :-) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8jens01-ifplugd-b44 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
