On 30/03/12 at 14:11 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: freeradius > > Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: wheezy sid > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > amd64. > > > > This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages > > (binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a recent dpkg that uses the > > build-arch target if available. > > Also, only the Build-Depends were installed, not the Build-Depends-Indep. > > > > Relevant part: > > > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'fr_perror' is defined in DSO > > > /?BUILDDIR?/freeradius-2.1.10+dfsg/src/lib/.libs/libfreeradius-radius-2.1.10.so > > > so try adding it to the linker command line > > > /?BUILDDIR?/freeradius-2.1.10+dfsg/src/lib/.libs/libfreeradius-radius-2.1.10.so: > > > could not read symbols: Invalid operation > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > The full build log is available from: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/30/freeradius_2.1.10+dfsg-3_unstable.log > > > > A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at > > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! > > Do you have any idea about any toolchain changes that might have caused this?
No, sorry. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
