On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@debian.org> wrote:
> ah -- and found that you adopted it already: > https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/109 > > https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/commit/590bd6238d7d2538a557ce664ee90f4b9116449c > 5 months ago > > cool -- thanks ;) > A bit related question: Does the test time matter for Debian or Linux packaging? With models that require a large number of iterations to solve and other slower methods, our test suite is getting a bit slow (for my taste). Josef > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > d'oh forgotten about it -- thanks Gregor > > > pystatsmodels people -- would you like to adopt this patch: > > > +--- > statsmodels-0.3.1.orig/scikits/statsmodels/discrete/tests/test_discrete.py > 2011-11-15 09:57:09.346314408 -0500 > > ++++ > statsmodels-0.3.1/scikits/statsmodels/discrete/tests/test_discrete.py > 2011-11-15 10:01:45.998317336 -0500 > > +@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ > > + res2.probit() > > + cls.res2 = res2 > > + cls.res1 = Probit(data.endog, data.exog).fit(method="cg", > > +- disp=0, maxiter=250) > > ++ disp=0, maxiter=500) > > + > > + class TestProbitNCG(CheckModelResults): > > + @classmethod > > > as a fixup for occasional unittest failures due to precision? > > > meanwhile I will feed it into Debian package of 0.3.1 > > > Cheers > > > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:57:37 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > > > Source: statsmodels > > > > Version: 0.3.1-3 > > > > Severity: serious > > > > Justification: fails to build from source > > > > Ubuntu has a patch at > > > > http://patches.ubuntu.com/s/statsmodels/statsmodels_0.3.1-3ubuntu1.patch > > > not sure if this is a good and/or future-proof idea ... > > > > Cheers, > > > gregor > -- > =------------------------------------------------------------------= > Keep in touch www.onerussian.com > Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic >
