On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:04:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:16:16PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > If it's only 30 packages we should rather push it into debhelper 9 now > > if that's okay with Joey. > > > > I'll make sure the 30 packages get rebuilt. > > I believe that debhelper 9.20120312 implements what we need. > > Niko pointed out a reliable way of finding the packages which need to > be rebuilt at > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662666#40>. > I guess we need an email to the buildd maintainers asking them to > update debhelper, and then you can kick off the binNMUs and I can > upload the few packages I have queued to bump to compat level 9.
Hi Moritz, Just wanted to check - are you happy to prod the buildd maintainers into making sure that debhelper >= 9.20120312 is installed, or should I? I'd like to make sure that the changes I've got queued up don't get forgotten about. (Is there even a way to get interrogate the buildds to get the current set of installed packages, or a policy about how often they should update from unstable?) Thanks, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
