On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:46:57PM -0700, James Blanford wrote: > OK, I was trying to goad you into checking and failed. So I reverted > the patch myself and rootok is still broken. I hereby change the bug to > "rootok module is broken and I don't know why". Going back to > 0.76-23 restores rootok's functionality.
Which makes even less sense, because the upstream diff between 0.76 and 0.79 for rootok is nil. Are you sure this isn't actually related to the update of login, which briefly caused /etc/pam.d/su to be missing from the package? I know you quoted an /etc/pam.d/su config to me earlier, but I'm not seeing this bug here and if you don't have an SELinux-enabled kernel I really don't have any other ideas why this is broken for you. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
