On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:28:44AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 21:17 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:32:23AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:14:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Source: linux-2.6 > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > Current versions of the Linux kernel will load most appropriate cpufreq > > > > modules automatically (using the new autoloading aliases based on x86 > > > > CPU models and features). > > > > > > Sadly that's only in 3.4 and depends on the removal of sysdevs in 3.3. > > > So we probably won't get it in wheezy. > > > > Seems to work fine here with 3.3. 3.4 fixed some issues with it, > > though. > > > > (Does wheezy actually have a sufficiently firm release date to predict > > a target kernel version at this point?) > [...] > > There is no prediction involved; we already took the decision to use > Linux 3.2.
Will that decision get revisited if more kernels get released before wheezy freezes? (Quite frequently I've noticed that a team chooses a particular upstream version of something for a Debian release, and then the release takes longer than expected.) - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
