* Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com>, 2012-03-17, 21:57:
Reviewing the lintian4python run of the DPMT/PAPT packages at http://people.debian.org/~jwilk/tmp/lintian4python-20120317.log I notices a lot of python-module-but-no-python-depends errors listed for docs packages.
Right, all of these are likely false positives: e: flufl.bounce source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-flufl.bounce-docs e: flufl.enum source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-flufl.enum-docs e: flufl.i18n source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-flufl.i18n-docs e: flufl.lock source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-flufl.lock-docs e: flufl.password source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-flufl.password-docs e: psycopg2 source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-psycopg2-docs e: pymilter source: python-module-but-no-python-depends python-milter-docs
I think -docs packages should be excluded from the check.
I already exclude packages ending with -dev, -dbg or -doc for this tag. I could exclude -docs too, or maybe exclude everything from section docs.
I wonder however why these packages use such unusual naming scheme: $ zcat Packages.gz | grep-dctrl -F Package -e '^.*-doc$' -ns Package | wc -l 2415 $ zcat Packages.gz | grep-dctrl -F Package -e '^.*-docs$' -ns Package | wc -l 42 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
