Le jeudi 03 février 2005 à 02:01 -0500, Eric Dorland a écrit : > * Jérôme Warnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 23:52 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:46:27PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 23:28 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 12:44:02AM +0100, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Le lundi 31 janvier 2005 à 00:40 -0500, Eric Dorland a écrit : > > > > > > > * Jerome Warnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > > Package: mozilla-firefox > > > > > > > > Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2 > > > > > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /usr/share/applications/mozilla-firefox.desktop obviously does > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > contain tranlsations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it's not. I will incorporate any translations people care to > > > > > > > provide. > > > > > > There is no upstream translation for that at all? > > > > > > > > > > > > I borrowed Galeon's .desktop file and attached it here. > > > > > > > > > > I don't get why "Mozilla Firefox" is translated into "Navigateur Web > > > > > Firefox". Why not just keep the name ? > > > > Because that's the way it is done for other browsers (Galeon and > > > > Epiphany at least) because everybody does not necessarily know what > > > > "Mozilla Firefox" is about. > > > > > > I think it's not translators role to decide whether to name programs in > > > a new way for convenience for the user. I think you should first > > > try to get the original version changed for this reason. > > > > > > OTOH, as for .desktop files, comments are there to enlight the user > > > about what the program does. > > At least for consistency with the others, it should be left like that > > for now. > > If you want to fight against that, don't come to me, but to all the > > other packagers (or maybe even upstream, I honestly don't know, and > > don't care). > > I have to agree with Mike here. I actually kind of thought that was > weird when I applied the patch, but it didn't register strongly enough > in my brain. Unless we want to translate it to "Renard de feu" or > something, I think it should be left alone. Could you then see that with the maintainers of other browsers which do like that? As I said, I personally don't care, except that I want to have something consistent in my menus.
