Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
> Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Dunno, but 2.6.10-ac5 has the following changelog entry that might
be worth taking a closer look at:
* Make gconfig work with current gtk 2.4 (J Magallon)
> Generally the kernel team doesn't really like putting stuff in that
> isn't going upstream. But in this case I am of the mind that as
> it can't possibly break the kernel, and given that gconfig is broken,
> it can't make is work less, we might as well put something like this
> if someone is willing to put the effort in to get it working.
OK. It's really not that much work to keep it (the .glade file) in
sync, so if the 2.6.10-ac5 fix isn't applicable then I could keep an
eye at it. Unless somebody else has a more dire urge to do so.
Regards
/Jocke
P.S.
Ping CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD Ping...
D.S.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
