Today at 17:04, Dafydd Harries wrote: > Ah, this list is just what I need. However, there are some glyphs which > are not in your list (see my previous mail to the bug report for > details), but which also seem to be broken. Perhaps some non-Serbian > Cyrillic glyphs are also broken.
Yes, I've noticed that you mention it, but I really can't help there, since I'm not familiar with those glyphs, and how they're used or how should they look. My guess would be as good as yours. All Cyrillic outside 0x400â0x45f range is used by non-Slavic Cyrillic languages, so I really don't know anything about it. > The reason for this is that the Chancery font in the version of Valek's > fonts which I grabbed doesn't seem to contain any of the Serbian glyphs. > Also, the Nimbus Sans Condensed has a few broken/missing glyphs. I've just checked 1.0.7pre39 tarball, and it has all of these. I remember asking Valek to provide a SFD tarball a few releases before that, but that didn't come with Chancery fixed-up (it was fixed a release or two after the rest of the stuff), so perhaps you're using that one instead? > Fontforge seems to be modifying the font metrics when I copy the glyphs, > so I suspect it's happening automatically. Ah, ok, I just thought I'd mention it, since I'm not sure about it :) > Unfortunately, the Debin bug tracking system doesn't have this feature > yet. I'll keep you informed on developments. :) Thanks Daf, I really appreciate that! (It's been a mess trying to get this fixed up for Serbian, and I've been trying to do that for quite some time already.) Cheers, Danilo
