On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:09:11AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > This is why I tended to agree with Joey. What I reported in #283923 is > indeed fixed, so my opinion would be closing te bug...while keeping > the real bug opened. > > Anyway, if something similar to #283923 happens in the future it is > quite likely to be reported against a completely different package as > the problem is not obvious to identitify as pertaining to apt at first > glance. > > On the other hand, the advantage of keeping #283923 opened is keeping > the long discussion in it, which finally concludes that the bug is in > APT, easy to find....
If you feel it would be useful to unmerge this bug and close it, feel free. It makes no real difference to me. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
