This one time, at band camp, Antonio Fiol Bonnín said: > I agree on that. But I disagree on the fact that the antivirus > administrator (and thus, the person responsible for his system saying: > "No virus found using pattern file XYZ") may be, and will most likely > be, in our case, not in charge for the configuration of the application, > which, for now, does not even control the size of the data, as it has no > specific requirement on data size. > > Of course the app could be modified to handle data size. But IMHO, if > the size limit is something related to the antivirus system, the limit > should be (only) configured on the antivirus system. > > To upstream: I beg you reconsider your position, having read the above. > > And thank you all anyway for your attention.
It appears that upstream ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was not included in your email. I would be happy to bring this to their attentin, but it won;t be today - I am a bit busy at present. If you have the time, could you forward your email (or even another pointer to the bug) to them, so that they understand why you want this feature? As I said, I am happy to do so if you don't get to it, but it will probably be quicker right now if you could. Thanks, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
pgpcozpdK6FWc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
