This one time, at band camp, Julian Mehnle said:
> Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The HTML docs are missing from the 0.81 release, too.  What
> > > happened?  Are there plans to include them again in future
> > > releases?
> >
> > There were problems generating HTML documentation (probably due to
> > broken TeX installation in Debian). The tarball now includes
> > clamdoc.tex so you can try to generate it yourself with latex2html.
> 
> Huh?  So they took out the HTML documentation because the Debian
> package had a small problem with it?  That can't be it, can it?

The package of clamav did not have a problem with it - latex2html was
screwing up or TeX was, not sure.  It builds fine locally for me, so I
am not sure what the problem is on their end.

> Anyway, if the HTML documentation is now omitted from the Debian
> packages, I'm very much inclined to reopen this bug and turn it into a
> wishlist bug explicitly requesting HTML documentation in the upcoming
> clamav-doc package.
> 
> What do you think?

I am including it 0.81, going in today or tomorrow - I have built it
locally, and it appears to render fine (although there is some strange
html in ALT statements for images).  You are free to reopn or file a new
bug, it will just be closed soon :)

Just give it time to go through the normal testbed cycle here - I
usually let it run on my MX for at least a few hours before an upload,
scan known virii, etc.

Take care,
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgptjHVTWgxBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to