Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.35-6
Severity: normal

I hit an interesting filesystem problem today, see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/21/118 . I ran e2fsck on the filesystem
with this unexpected result:

e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
/dev/md4: clean, 16/132480 files, -15514/264960 blocks

I had figured that e2fsck would notice a negative block count. I forced
fsck did find and fix the problem:

e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong for group #2 (34308, counted=32306).
Fix<y>? yes

Free blocks count wrong for group #6 (45805, counted=32306).
Fix<y>? yes

Free blocks count wrong for group #8 (14741, counted=2354).
Fix<y>? yes

Free blocks count wrong (280474, counted=252586).
Fix<y>? yes


/dev/md4: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/md4: 16/132480 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 12374/264960 blocks
zsh: exit 1     e2fsck -f /dev/md4
[costa;~]-40# mount /tmp
[costa;~]-41# df -h /tmp
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md4             1019M   33M  935M   4% /tmp


Wichert.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages e2fsprogs depends on:
ii  e2fslibs                    1.36rc2-1    ext2 filesystem libraries
ii  libblkid1                   1.36rc2-1    block device id library
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr2                  1.36rc2-1    common error description library
ii  libss2                      1.36rc2-1    command-line interface parsing lib
ii  libuuid1                    1.36rc2-1    universally unique id library

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to