On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> I've investigated the file you sent me, and it was very helpful
> indeed, thanks.  What is going on is that when a filesystem is resized
> enough so that we need to move the inode table, we reserve both the
> old and new locations of the inode table.  However, we aren't
> releasing the blocks where the inode table used to be located after
> the resize.  So this isn't a fatal error, in that it doesn't cause any
> data loss; the next e2fsck will release the blocks.  

Great that you found this bug! It actually sounds quite harmless, so no 
more fear for the data :-)

Greetings,

Walter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to