Hallo Hilmar, teTeX CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Log message: > [experimental] splitting patchtargets to the new dsf-patch system And you wrote: > Maybe that request is already obsolete due to Franks work on teTeX > beta: I'd like to see a patch target in debian/rules to make sure > debian/rules won't try to patch the tetex sources once again when > calling "./debian/rules binary" a second time and the source was > already patched. I have implemented this in 2.99.9; however if there is a problem we should also fix it in 2.0.2. It's just that I don't see the problem, because we already have configure-stamp. So in order to run into the problem you descirbe (double patching when calling the binary target), it seems to me you must manually remove configure-stamp, instead of either keeping it, or rather call clean. Why do you need to remove it, and what do you gain by not doing it with clean? I assumed that if one runs ./configure with changed options, just about everything needs to be remaked, anyway. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
