On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:33:18PM +0100, Stef Epardaud wrote:
> socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 8
> bind(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(918),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
> connect(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(893),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.14.1")}, 16) = 0
> write(8, "\200\0\0LIw\366\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\1\206\244\0\0\0\2"..., 80) =
> 80
> poll([{fd=8, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1
> read(8, "\200\0\10\\Iw\366\200\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4000) =
> 2144
> close(8) = 0
> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
>
> Somehow I'm not sure why it would bind a socket locally before connecting
> it to the NIS server, but I'm not sure whether this is wrong or even related
> to the segfault.
The socket opening stuff is something your nisbindings do, not a dbus thing.
Could you trace the daemon with ltrace and provide the last part of the output.
It's probably something that's being triggered by the fact your using nis for
authentication.. Makes me wonder what the other reporters are using for
authentitcation.
> I'm running the latest debian unstable with dbus 0.23.
>
> Please tell me if I should report this upstream or how to get more info
> from my breakage, it's very frustrating.
Your the first to give someusefull feedback :) Getting no feedback is also very
frustrating..
Sjoerd
--
Wonder is the feeling of a philosopher, and philosophy begins in wonder.
-- Socrates, quoting Plato
[Huh? That's like Johnson quoting Boswell]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
